Scholarly open access journals, Peer-reviewed, and Refereed Journals, Impact factor 8.14 (Calculate by google scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool) , Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Indexing in all major database & Metadata, Citation Generator, Digital Object Identifier(DOI)
The software development process, especially those implementing agile methods, cannot be separated from the testing stage. End-to-end testing ensures that the application functions properly in a production environment and provides a seamless user experience. The purpose of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis of manual testing and automation testing using the Katalon Studio tool on the Dusdusan.com website and to determine a faster testing method so that software development runs smoothly and on time. This study was conducted by involving manual testing via the Google Chrome web browser and automatic testing using the Katalon Studio tool for 12 iterations. Based on the results obtained, the average time required for automation testing is shorter than manual testing. Therefore, in terms of time efficiency, automation testing is proven to be faster than manual testing.
Keywords:
automation testing, comparasion analysis, dusdusan.com, end-to-end testing, katalon studio
Cite Article:
"ANALYSIS OF MANUAL AND AUTOMATIC TESTING METHOD COMPARISON AT PT DUSDUSAN.COM", International Journal of Science & Engineering Development Research (www.ijrti.org), ISSN:2455-2631, Vol.10, Issue 8, page no.a66-a71, August-2025, Available :http://www.ijrti.org/papers/IJRTI2508012.pdf
Downloads:
000835
ISSN:
2456-3315 | IMPACT FACTOR: 8.14 Calculated By Google Scholar| ESTD YEAR: 2016
An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 8.14 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator