IJRTI
International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation
International Peer Reviewed & Refereed Journals, Open Access Journal
ISSN Approved Journal No: 2456-3315 | Impact factor: 8.14 | ESTD Year: 2016
Scholarly open access journals, Peer-reviewed, and Refereed Journals, Impact factor 8.14 (Calculate by google scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool) , Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Indexing in all major database & Metadata, Citation Generator, Digital Object Identifier(DOI)

Call For Paper

For Authors

Forms / Download

Published Issue Details

Editorial Board

Other IMP Links

Facts & Figure

Impact Factor : 8.14

Issue per Year : 12

Volume Published : 11

Issue Published : 121

Article Submitted : 24737

Article Published : 9361

Total Authors : 24875

Total Reviewer : 861

Total Countries : 169

Indexing Partner

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Published Paper Details
Paper Title: Role and Evidentiary Value of Forensic Toxicology in NDPS Cases: A Critical Study of Procedural Compliance and Judicial Interpretation
Authors Name: Ms. Mansi Srivastava , Ms. Tania Choutala , Ms. Sakshi , Ms. Shalini Pant , Ms. Deepannita Medhi
Download E-Certificate: Download
Author Reg. ID:
IJRTI_212861
Published Paper Id: IJRTI2605142
Published In: Volume 11 Issue 5, May-2026
DOI:
Abstract: Forensic toxicology has become the scientific fulcrum of prosecutions under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), because the prosecution must prove not only the recovery of a substance but also that it is a notified narcotic drug or psychotropic substance in a particular quantity and purity. The Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report and related toxicological evidence therefore often make the difference between conviction and acquittal, while at the same time functioning within a legal regime that is both draconian in its sentencing structure and highly technical in its procedural safeguards. Indian courts, especially the Supreme Court and various High Courts, have repeatedly underscored that strict compliance with statutory provisions, standing orders on seizure and sampling, and chain‑of‑custody norms is indispensable in NDPS trials, and that lapses in these respects can seriously erode or even destroy the evidentiary value of forensic toxicology reports. This paper critically examines the dual role of forensic toxicology in NDPS cases, as a powerful incriminating tool and as a vulnerable point of challenge, by analysing the statutory framework, the NDPS (Seizure, Storage, Sampling and Disposal) Rules, 2022, the erstwhile standing orders on sampling, and key judicial decisions including Noor Aga v. State of Punjab, Thana Singh v. Central Bureau of Narcotics, and Hira Singh v. Union of India. It argues that courts have moved toward a calibrated approach: while recognising the indispensability of expert opinion in establishing the nature of the contraband, they also insist on rigorous procedural compliance as a constitutional counter‑weight to the NDPS Act’s reverse onus and stringent penalties. The study adopts a doctrinal and analytical methodology based on close reading of statutes, rules, standing orders and case law, supplemented by contemporary academic and practitioner commentary on forensic evidence in NDPS trials. It concludes that although forensic toxicology has high evidentiary value, inconsistent investigative practices, under‑resourced laboratories and divergent judicial approaches to procedural lapses generate legal uncertainty, and it proposes reforms relating to accreditation of laboratories, standardisation of toxicological protocols, digitised chain‑of‑custody systems and clearer judicial standards for the consequences of non‑compliance, all framed in the context of the accused’s Article 21 rights.
Keywords: NDPS, Article 21, Forensic Science Laboratory, Forensic Toxicology, Evidentiary Value
Cite Article: "Role and Evidentiary Value of Forensic Toxicology in NDPS Cases: A Critical Study of Procedural Compliance and Judicial Interpretation", International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation (www.ijrti.org), ISSN:2456-3315, Vol.11, Issue 5, page no.b341-b353, May-2026, Available :http://www.ijrti.org/papers/IJRTI2605142.pdf
Downloads: 000108
ISSN: 2456-3315 | IMPACT FACTOR: 8.14 Calculated By Google Scholar| ESTD YEAR: 2016
An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 8.14 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator
Publication Details: Published Paper ID: IJRTI2605142
Registration ID:212861
Published In: Volume 11 Issue 5, May-2026
DOI (Digital Object Identifier):
Page No: b341-b353
Country: Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Research Area: Arts
Publisher : IJ Publication
Published Paper URL : https://www.ijrti.org/viewpaperforall?paper=IJRTI2605142
Published Paper PDF: https://www.ijrti.org/papers/IJRTI2605142
Share Article:

Click Here to Download This Article

Article Preview
Click Here to Download This Article

Major Indexing from www.ijrti.org
Google Scholar ResearcherID Thomson Reuters Mendeley : reference manager Academia.edu
arXiv.org : cornell university library Research Gate CiteSeerX DOAJ : Directory of Open Access Journals
DRJI Index Copernicus International Scribd DocStoc

ISSN Details

ISSN: 2456-3315
Impact Factor: 8.14 and ISSN APPROVED, Journal Starting Year (ESTD) : 2016

DOI (A digital object identifier)


Providing A digital object identifier by DOI.ONE
How to Get DOI?

Conference

Open Access License Policy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Creative Commons License This material is Open Knowledge This material is Open Data This material is Open Content

Important Details

Join RMS/Earn 300

IJRTI

WhatsApp
Click Here

Indexing Partner