EFFICACY OF BOBATH VERSUS PARTIAL WIEGHT BEARING TREADMILL TRAINING IN INCREASING STRENGTH AND STEP LENGTH IN POST STROKE REHABILITATION - A RANDOMISED COMPARATIVE STUDY
IJRTI2311068
Volume 8, Issue 11
Page 496 - 508
November 2023
205,637 Downloads
PublishedOpen AccessResearch PaperTransparent Peer ReviewedCC BY 4.0
ISSN2456-3315
Impact Factor10.57
UGC CAREApproved
Low Cost₹599 / $45
CrossRefDOI
ESTD2016
Peer ReviewTransparent
AccessOpen
Submission: Always Open
Paper Title
EFFICACY OF BOBATH VERSUS PARTIAL WIEGHT BEARING TREADMILL TRAINING IN INCREASING STRENGTH AND STEP LENGTH IN POST STROKE REHABILITATION - A RANDOMISED COMPARATIVE STUDY
Authors
Upendra Krishna Kamal Raju , Dr. K. Madhavi , Dr. A.S.Beena , Dr. K. Indira Pavani
OBJECTIVE:
To determine the effectiveness of Bobath technique in the treatment of stroke patients in improving strength and step length of lower limb
To determine the effectiveness of partial weight bearing treadmill training technique in the treatment of stroke patients in improving strength and step length of lower limb
To compare the effectiveness of Bobath technique and partial weight bearing treadmill training treatment in post stroke patients to improve strength and step length.
METHODOLOGY:
40 patients were assigned into 2 groups by random allocation. Group-A (NDT Bobath treatment) consists of 20 patients.
Group-B (partial weight bearing treadmill training) consists of 20 patients.
Prior to the starting of the intervention program pre assessment was done by using outcome measures of foot print step length and brunnstrom voluntary control grading test for both the groups.
PROCEDURE:
Intervention program for 12 weeks in which Group-A NDT techniques
Group-B partial weight bearing treadmill exercises.
After the 12 weeks intervention posttest assessment was taken by using outcome measures of foot print step length and brunnstrom voluntary control grading test for both the groups.
RESULTS:
Statistical analysis of the data showed both the groups A and B showed significant difference from pre to post intervention. But on comparing mean values of Group A & B, Group B showed more improvement than Group A.
Statistical analysis of the data showed both the groups A and B showed significant difference from pre to post intervention. But on comparing mean values of Group A & B, Group B showed more improvement than Group A.
Both the groups A and B showed significant difference from pre to post intervention. But on comparing mean values of Group A & B, Group B showed more improvement than Group A.
CONCLUSION:
Partial weight bearing treadmill training group is found to be clinically more effective with greater percentage of improvement than NDT- Bobath technique alone. Further between the groups comparison found that there is statistically significant difference and better improvement of all outcome measures of Partial weight bearing treadmill training.
Choose the style your journal or department asks for, then copy it.
Every version below is generated from this paper's own record.
IJRTI — journal style
"EFFICACY OF BOBATH VERSUS PARTIAL WIEGHT BEARING TREADMILL TRAINING IN INCREASING STRENGTH AND STEP LENGTH IN POST STROKE REHABILITATION - A RANDOMISED COMPARATIVE STUDY", IJRTI - International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation (www.ijrti.org), ISSN:2456-3315, Vol.8, Issue 11, page no.496 - 508, November-2023, Available :https://ijrti.org/papers/IJRTI2311068.pdf
APA — 7th edition
Raju, U. K. K., Madhavi, K., A.S.Beena, & Pavani, K. I. (2023). EFFICACY OF BOBATH VERSUS PARTIAL WIEGHT BEARING TREADMILL TRAINING IN INCREASING STRENGTH AND STEP LENGTH IN POST STROKE REHABILITATION - A RANDOMISED COMPARATIVE STUDY. International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation, 8(11), 496 - 508. https://ijrti.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJRTI2311068
MLA — 9th edition
Raju, Upendra Krishna Kamal, et al. "EFFICACY OF BOBATH VERSUS PARTIAL WIEGHT BEARING TREADMILL TRAINING IN INCREASING STRENGTH AND STEP LENGTH IN POST STROKE REHABILITATION - A RANDOMISED COMPARATIVE STUDY." International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation, vol. 8, no. 11, 2023, pp. 496 - 508, https://ijrti.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJRTI2311068.
Chicago — 17th, bibliography
Raju, Upendra Krishna Kamal, et al. "EFFICACY OF BOBATH VERSUS PARTIAL WIEGHT BEARING TREADMILL TRAINING IN INCREASING STRENGTH AND STEP LENGTH IN POST STROKE REHABILITATION - A RANDOMISED COMPARATIVE STUDY." International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation 8, no. 11 (2023): 496 - 508. https://ijrti.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJRTI2311068.
Harvard — author–date
Raju, U.K.K. et al. (2023) 'EFFICACY OF BOBATH VERSUS PARTIAL WIEGHT BEARING TREADMILL TRAINING IN INCREASING STRENGTH AND STEP LENGTH IN POST STROKE REHABILITATION - A RANDOMISED COMPARATIVE STUDY', International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation, 8(11), pp. 496 - 508. Available at: https://ijrti.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJRTI2311068
IEEE — numbered reference
U. K. K. Raju, K. Madhavi, A.S.Beena and K. I. Pavani, "EFFICACY OF BOBATH VERSUS PARTIAL WIEGHT BEARING TREADMILL TRAINING IN INCREASING STRENGTH AND STEP LENGTH IN POST STROKE REHABILITATION - A RANDOMISED COMPARATIVE STUDY," IJRTI, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 496 - 508, Nov. 2023.
Vancouver — biomedical
Raju UKK, Madhavi K, A.S.Beena, Pavani KI. EFFICACY OF BOBATH VERSUS PARTIAL WIEGHT BEARING TREADMILL TRAINING IN INCREASING STRENGTH AND STEP LENGTH IN POST STROKE REHABILITATION - A RANDOMISED COMPARATIVE STUDY. IJRTI. 2023 Nov;8(11):496 - 508.
AMA — 11th edition
Raju UKK, Madhavi K, A.S.Beena, Pavani KI. EFFICACY OF BOBATH VERSUS PARTIAL WIEGHT BEARING TREADMILL TRAINING IN INCREASING STRENGTH AND STEP LENGTH IN POST STROKE REHABILITATION - A RANDOMISED COMPARATIVE STUDY. IJRTI. 2023;8(11):496 - 508. Accessed at https://ijrti.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJRTI2311068
BibTeX — Zotero, Mendeley, LaTeX
@article{IJRTI2311068,
author = {Upendra Krishna Kamal Raju and K. Madhavi and A.S.Beena and K. Indira Pavani},
title = {EFFICACY OF BOBATH VERSUS PARTIAL WIEGHT BEARING TREADMILL TRAINING IN INCREASING STRENGTH AND STEP LENGTH IN POST STROKE REHABILITATION - A RANDOMISED COMPARATIVE STUDY},
journal = {International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation},
volume = {8},
number = {11},
pages = {496 - 508},
year = {2023},
month = {November},
issn = {2456-3315},
url = {https://ijrti.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJRTI2311068}
}
RIS — EndNote, RefWorks
TY - JOUR
AU - Raju, Upendra Krishna Kamal
AU - Madhavi, K.
AU - A.S.Beena
AU - Pavani, K. Indira
TI - EFFICACY OF BOBATH VERSUS PARTIAL WIEGHT BEARING TREADMILL TRAINING IN INCREASING STRENGTH AND STEP LENGTH IN POST STROKE REHABILITATION - A RANDOMISED COMPARATIVE STUDY
T2 - International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation
JA - IJRTI
VL - 8
IS - 11
PY - 2023
SN - 2456-3315
UR - https://ijrti.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJRTI2311068
SP - 496
EP - 508
ER -
International Journal for Research Trends and InnovationPublished by IJRTI (JW Publication)
2456-3315ISSN
10.57Impact Factor
2016ESTD Year
OpenAccess
Impact Factor 10.57 calculated by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar.
An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 10.57 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator
UGC CARE Approved Journal — Transparent Peer-reviewed journal aligned with UGC’s 2025 suggestive parameters, with CrossRef DOI registration and Scopus Standard metadata on every published paper.
Disclaimer:
The content, data and findings in this article are based on the authors’ research and have been
peer-reviewed for academic purposes only. Readers are advised to verify all information before practical
or commercial use. The journal and its editorial board are not liable for any errors, losses or
consequences arising from its use.
Declarations
Funding
No external funding was received for this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the reviewers and the editorial board of International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation for their careful reading and constructive comments, and all colleagues who supported the preparation of this manuscript.