This study considers uncertainties in material strengths and the modeling which have important effects on structural resistance force based on reliability theory. After analyzing the destruction mechanism of a RC bridge, structural functions and the reliability were given, then the safety level of the piers of a reinforced concrete continuous against earthquake was analyzed. Using response surface method to calculate the failure probabilities of bridge piers under high-level earthquake, their seismic reliability for different damage states within the design reference period were calculated applying two-stage design, which describes seismic safety level of the built bridges to some extent.Capacity design procedure for the earthquake-resistant reinforced concrete (RC) structures is effective when actual member capacities do not greatly exceed the assumed design capacities. Moreover, RC members are expected to undergo large inelastic deformations for adequate seismic energy dissipation. Since flexural capacity and post-yield behavior of an RC member is largely controlled by steel reinforcing bars, it places certain special requirements on their properties, such as, yield strength (YS), ultimate tensile strength to yield strength ratio (UTS/YS ratio) and elongation, which are sensitive to the method of manufacturing bars. Flexural tests on RC beams which used rebars of carefully controlled properties was conducted and it was observed that for dependable flexure behaviour, YS and UTS values should lie in a narrow band around values used in the member design. If these values are greater than the specified value, it may cause brittle shear failure instead of more ductile and desirable flexure mode of failure. Moreover, a high UTS/YS ratio equal to 1.25 is necessary to have dependable peak strength which is larger than the yield strength. This study investigates the effects of soil abutment interaction on seismic analysis abutment attract a large portion of seismic forces. A design drive methodology to model the abutment stiffness for either linear or non-linear analysis considering the backfill and pier foundation.
Choose the style your journal or department asks for, then copy it.
Every version below is generated from this paper's own record.
IJRTI — journal style
"Seismic Safety Evaluation of Bridges : a review", IJRTI - International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation (www.ijrti.org), ISSN:2456-3315, Vol.4, Issue 4, page no.9 - 11, April-2019, Available :https://ijrti.org/papers/IJRTI1904003.pdf
APA — 7th edition
Mishra, H., & Shrivastava, S. (2019). Seismic Safety Evaluation of Bridges : a review. International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation, 4(4), 9 - 11. https://ijrti.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJRTI1904003
MLA — 9th edition
Mishra, Himanshu, and Shikha Shrivastava. "Seismic Safety Evaluation of Bridges : a review." International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, 2019, pp. 9 - 11, https://ijrti.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJRTI1904003.
Chicago — 17th, bibliography
Mishra, Himanshu, and Shikha Shrivastava. "Seismic Safety Evaluation of Bridges : a review." International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation 4, no. 4 (2019): 9 - 11. https://ijrti.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJRTI1904003.
Harvard — author–date
Mishra, H. and Shrivastava, S. (2019) 'Seismic Safety Evaluation of Bridges : a review', International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation, 4(4), pp. 9 - 11. Available at: https://ijrti.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJRTI1904003
IEEE — numbered reference
H. Mishra and S. Shrivastava, "Seismic Safety Evaluation of Bridges : a review," IJRTI, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 9 - 11, Apr. 2019.
Vancouver — biomedical
Mishra H, Shrivastava S. Seismic Safety Evaluation of Bridges : a review. IJRTI. 2019 Apr;4(4):9 - 11.
AMA — 11th edition
Mishra H, Shrivastava S. Seismic Safety Evaluation of Bridges : a review. IJRTI. 2019;4(4):9 - 11. Accessed at https://ijrti.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJRTI1904003
BibTeX — Zotero, Mendeley, LaTeX
@article{IJRTI1904003,
author = {Himanshu Mishra and Shikha Shrivastava},
title = {Seismic Safety Evaluation of Bridges : a review},
journal = {International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation},
volume = {4},
number = {4},
pages = {9 - 11},
year = {2019},
month = {April},
issn = {2456-3315},
url = {https://ijrti.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJRTI1904003}
}
RIS — EndNote, RefWorks
TY - JOUR
AU - Mishra, Himanshu
AU - Shrivastava, Shikha
TI - Seismic Safety Evaluation of Bridges : a review
T2 - International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation
JA - IJRTI
VL - 4
IS - 4
PY - 2019
SN - 2456-3315
UR - https://ijrti.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJRTI1904003
SP - 9
EP - 11
ER -
International Journal for Research Trends and InnovationPublished by IJRTI (JW Publication)
2456-3315ISSN
10.57Impact Factor
2016ESTD Year
OpenAccess
Impact Factor 10.57 calculated by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar.
An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 10.57 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator
UGC CARE Approved Journal — Transparent Peer-reviewed journal aligned with UGC’s 2025 suggestive parameters, with CrossRef DOI registration and Scopus Standard metadata on every published paper.
Disclaimer:
The content, data and findings in this article are based on the authors’ research and have been
peer-reviewed for academic purposes only. Readers are advised to verify all information before practical
or commercial use. The journal and its editorial board are not liable for any errors, losses or
consequences arising from its use.
Declarations
Funding
No external funding was received for this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the reviewers and the editorial board of International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation for their careful reading and constructive comments, and all colleagues who supported the preparation of this manuscript.